Hm! Observ că întrebarea se referă de fapt la timpul întâmplării, nu dacă întâmplarea se va întâmpla.
Ce întrebare îmi veni să pun...
Timpul, în astrologia orară
"
Timing in horary astrology is my specialty. I cannot stop wondering how accurate a clock our planetary system is, and with what precision the unfoldment of events can be predicted by simple, straightforward techniques.
My timing lectures usually start like this:
»You see, my dear students, this is the zodiacal circle. The circle has 360 degrees. Every degree corresponds to one unit of time. Units can be minutes, days, weeks, months or years. To arrive by the number of time unites elapsing until the predicted event, you count the number of degrees that are separating the Moon from an exact aspect with the significator (provided the aspect is an applying one, of course), or the number of degrees that separate the Moon or the significator from one of the angles, or the number of degrees that separate the Moon or the significator from the end of the sign they are in. These three methods are the most reliable ones, in my experience. Some astrologers use other methods, involving two planets for example, but I prefer the ones that I mentioned. I find that the Moon is by far the strongest timing indicator, and that, as concerns timing, we shouldn’t ignore even the non-ptolemaic aspects if she makes any on her way through the zodiacal circle. Sign boundaries do not act as real boundaries when timing is concerned. They can indicate a change or an event, or even point to the time when the action is completed or the subject matter is resolved, but if the Moon completes an aspect with the significator in the next sign, that’s OK, sign boundaries don’t really stop her.«
»After having ascertained the number of time units elapsing until the predicted (expected) event, we must decide on the type of time units. For this purpose, the generally accepted measure of time is a good staring point, but, nevertheless, just a starting point. Bear in mind that as concerns the sign modes (quadruplicities), cardinals are the shortest (or quickest), fixed ar the longest (or slowest) and mutables are somewhere in between. As concerns houses, angular are the quickest (or shortest), succedent are slower (or longer) and cadent are the slowest (or longest). Combinations give combinations. Crucial is the Moon’s (or the applying planet’s) sign and house. For example, the Moon in a cadent house and in a fixed sign suggests the longest time unit which could be years – all things considered, of course. Common sense is all-important in this sort of judgement. Never go by the book. If your common sense tells you that the suggested time unit is completely illogical, choose another.
If, in the course of her applying to a significator, the Moon changes signs or houses, stick with the original sign and house. Don’t combine time units. It doesn’t work this way. For example, if the Moon is at 28 of a cardinal sign and will complete the aspect when at 5 of a fixed sign, stick with the cardinal suggestion of a short time unit.
If the Moon applies to a retrograde planet, time can be a bit shortened, like if there’s a 7 degrees distance between herself and the significator, the event can follow in 6 instead of in 7 days, or in 6,5 instead of in 7 weeks, etc. We don’t shorten time units in such cases, we shorten the time itself, although cases have been known when a question was asked at the time when a large majority of planets (together with the Moon) were retrograde and the question resolved in weeks instead of in days, or in months instead of in weeks, etc., and vice versa.«"
www.emakurent.com/en/2017/02/09/timing-in-horary-astrology/